| ||Archives: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9|
Hi. I've opened up a forum to discuss a proposal to deal with our first-person-in-articles issue. Can you please give it a glance and share any feedback. Thanks 69.l25 (talk) 04:40, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
Project Medal Edit
You have been awarded the Nukapedia Project Medal for your efforts within the Fallout 3 and New Vegas quotations project.
For participating in the FO3 and F:NV quotations project Into the wild blue yonder... 04:58, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
Sorry it's late. I didn't realize the project was declared finished. Into the wild blue yonder... 04:58, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
If people start editing on the same page just after I did, I'm checking it. Force of habit. Even admins... Jspoel 18:25, March 6, 2014 (UTC)
- I knew that. Things are good over here, thanks. Jspoel 18:31, March 6, 2014 (UTC)
Request for recommendation Edit
I would like you, User:Tocinoman and User:Skire to take a look at a recent edit made by ToCxHawK on his user page. It seems that after another user was banned from chat (and later site-blocked), ToCxHawK posted a quote of that user's comment, the one the other user was banned for, on his user page (which he later removed). Frankly, to me, posting that comment in any form, quoting someone else or not, is very disturbing, and I feel a violation of policy meriting administrative action. I understand that we are required to assume good faith, so I asked him on his talk page to explain the reasoning behind posting the offensive quoted comment. His reply to me can be summed up as "I found it hilarious". I, personally, can find no humor at all in someone saying what the quoted user said. His explanation, to me, does not show he posted the objectionable content in error or any other way that can be termed "good faith". It appears to me that he either agrees with the sentiment, or, more probably, that he enjoys the offensive comment so much that he choose to re-post it as a quote on his user page.
If it were left up to me, he would be blocked for this edit. But understanding that I am one of the main targets of the comment he quoted, I am not comfortable doing that. I would prefer that you three examine this and return a recommendation to me for action. Please, in concert with the others, examine this and let me know of your decision, whatever that may be, as soon as you find possible. 01:11, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
Chattin' up a stormEdit
Think you could pop into chat for a few minutes? Into the wild blue yonder... 03:24, March 8, 2014 (UTC)