Why did you archive your talkpage? You're nowhere near 32k of content or 40 messages. You do know of the new policy rule about this, right? Jspoel 19:49, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
10k?? That's only a few messages. I can hardly believe Clyde said that, he knows enough of the new policy. You can read about it here. Jspoel 20:02, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
Hey Mara. You can also read the discussion page in the fora. It was 32KB which was the final agreed upon limit (the originally proposed one had been even higher). --Skire (talk) 20:05, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
Could you check what i did in Noteable loot?? im a Wikia Noob :P
hay whats the big deal taking down my edit --Zac115 21:18, May 17, 2012 (UTC)zac115
NP. I hope you didn't mind me cutting in like that, trying to be more proactive with NUN promotion to editors who are stuggling with reverts. Agent c 21:55, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
But I addeded he link now and fixed the writhing why do you say it's still wrong?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.58.136.10 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
Hrmm? Is there something wrong with changing "at" to "within"? Personally, it sounds better, and flows a little better when reading the article.
I am Legacy Tech. 18:50, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Great Mara. Just a quick reminder - remember to use {{subst:Rwwr}} for the template, so it works properly. Thanks =) --Skire (talk) 20:03, June 6, 2012 (UTC)
I have a feeling you could tell me many a horror story. :') What did you go in as, anyways? I'm going in as a diver. Not sure about the specifics yet, (I'll probably go in as an underwater welder.) I'll be talking to the recruiter again about that when I get back from Norway in August. Skål! 05:12, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
I worry about not being able to keep up either. :') It'll be nice though, because if I can, they provide free college courses along with providing the Apprenticeship I need before being able to kick-start a diving career. Not sure I can handle being a nuclear inspector, so I'll probably rely on being a Scuba instructor or something as a fall-back/retirement option. Skål! 05:20, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I edited it because I saw two errors. I didn't know it wasn't allowed to just correct spelling errors. Anyway, it won't happen again.
The Enclave shall prevail! 06:17, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
Almost all PC players have some sort of mod, so it'll be hard to find a video without it. I do believe it because I personally recall such an event happening during my playthrough of Eureka! --Skire (talk) 19:31, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
I played through all questlines on Xbox 360. I also remember that Howitzer being destroyed.-- 19:34, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
What does noindex do? Anyway, it leaves a red link as a category. Can you remove it? Jspoel 15:39, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Did you add that then because you don't want to be found on the internet? Looks a bit unnecessary to me, you have a nickname anyway. Jspoel 15:52, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Why the delete of the sugar bomb location? If you go look it's exactly where I said.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexyblakely (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
Hi, Great Mara! I did realise that he deleted information he himself added, but that doesn't make the information invaluable; I actually think it was a good addition, don't you think? It deserves to be in the Notes section. --C'n-Frankie-ArroyoTalk 17:14, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, Great Mara, I hadn't got the gist of the message (read it quickly). You're right. However, I don't think capitalisation was necessary; it doesn't look good one anyone's talk page, and I'm sure you wouldn't like it on yours. Cheers, --C'n-Frankie-ArroyoTalk 18:10, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
I don't know why the pages aren't showing up in the verification overdue category. I'll ask Grunny about it one of these days. Jspoel 21:39, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
It's some cache issue, for some reason you have to null edit a page before they show up in the category. Hawk da Barber 2012 21:48, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
Whoops, I did that wrong XD The history I've learned about that was from a while ago. So was his edit correct or not? --Skire (talk) 17:47, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Well thanks for letting me know, I want to get it right - what do you suggest we do? --Skire (talk) 12:09, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
Take a look at Forum:Concerns regarding the Bug Verification Project, along with our content policy, specifically the bugs section (I'm sure you know it like the back of your hand). There is nothing that justifies indiscriminate, systematic tagging of bugs for verification simply because there aren't any platform tags. The project should be geared towards actually adding platform tags, not basically marking them for deletion (ends up happening most of the time). Just because they do not have specific platform tags does not mean the bug is not real. And as per policy, if a bug in question is not dubious or suspicious, there is no reason for it to be marked for verification. The documentation on {{Verify}} states the template is to be used for facts that need verification - a lack of specific platform tags does not equate to the entire bug needing verification, as in questioning its truth value. --Skire (talk) 20:27, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
You removed my valid edit. It's rude & ur not to do that again, or I'll call the mods. The typos and grammar will be fixed, so do NOT remove my text from the Dick Johnson. K thanks.
Hey Mara. Since you're a big-time editor here and you know the policy like the back of your hand (assuming you know the back of your hand well), can you take some time to vote on the policy in the fora? I simply want as many votes to be in as possible, to seal the deal, especially votes of the more significant editors. Thanks =) --Skire (talk) 21:02, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
Ok...
I will post my changes again in Parker's-Site.
Since this was a video about the bug it was completely relevant to the topic even if the version of the game was german.
So if you delete something, please write a comprehensible explanation of your actions because nazi-ing around isn't the goal of a wikia.
Weapon repair kits seem to have been listed as notable due to their limited amount of fixed locations in game. Although you have a great point of them being easily created massively out of relatively easy-to-find parts, I think these few locations should be listed. 108.20.131.127 21:45, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
Infuriating place, isn't it? They banned me, but I still left my piece over my talk-page. Feel free to deliver any of my points straight to those ignoramuses if you get the chance. ;) See you around, Mara. Skål! 11:54, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
I will absolutely partition for your rights to be restored so you can further represent your case. If he refuses, I will add it to the 'Updates' section on my forum at CC. And yes, his constant need to remove my counter-points is quite amusing. I added that as well to my forum. Skål! 04:18, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
Sent him a message. I'll update you on his response. If there is one. Skål! 04:27, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
He refused to remove your ban. However, he reduced it to just 2 hours. Try editing your talk-page. Not sure if that's still there or not. Skål! 04:51, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
Hi! What's so "specific" about this particular Gutsy? Looks pretty normal to me... except it's leveled and starting at PC_level 11 it becomes a Mister Gutsy with DT 25. Check for "LvlGutsy" in the GECK, if you don't believe me. --Theodorico (talk) 22:52, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
Here's a screenshot for your convinience.Yeah, there's a small trick in this leveled list - it has "Calculate from all levels <= PC's level" checked, so even at level 37 there's 50/50 chance to get either a "Mister Gutsy Prototype" (DT 0) either a "Mister Gutsy" (DT 25).--Theodorico (talk) 00:01, September 19, 2012 (UTC)
Just FYI, I never said Skyrim, I said Oblivion, which was released BEFORE Fallout 3. Even if it was released after, it doesn't matter. Both Bigsley and Dyus are visually similar and act the same way, and have the same voice, regardless of which game came first. My edit is restored.
Hey, Mara! I was wondering if you would like to upload an electronic signature? I am currently creating the Grand Prize for Chad's Fallout: Apprentice, and I am wanting to create a plaque that has all of the consenting leadership's signatures and thanks on it! Some Assembly Required! 14:23, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
Both "While" and "Whilst" are proper American-English words. Whilst might be of an older English, but it is still a proper word to use here. (It is also considered more literary, which is what we strive for on an encyclopedia of knowledge.) Some Assembly Required! 16:58, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
While it had more use found in the UK, it was still a word born from American minds. However, I digress. After looking it up, I see it's considered more archaic than literary. Feel free to make your changes again. I just thought it strange for an anon to all the sudden start making systematical changes for something so minor. Some Assembly Required! 17:05, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Sounds like fun on a bun. ;) Sorry for the trouble, then. Get a little paranoid myself when I see changes like that. Bias takes over when I see them being made by the anonymous, as well. There's quite a few times where users feel like they have to dumb down articles. Thanks for stopping by and clarifying. :) Some Assembly Required! 17:13, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Probably for simplicity's sake. :P You start looking into pywikipedia as well if you're messing around with Python. ;D Some Assembly Required! 19:22, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mara. I know I've talked to you somewhat about this topic in the past, but I would like to bring it up again if you don't mind: I really think you should run for an administrator position here. Now I realise you expressed in the past that you uninterested, but I honestly see a lot of great admin-like qualities - professionalism, editing consistency/quality/quantity, and helpfulness. You've also been around and editing for awhile, and are our oldest still-active patroller. While this shouldn't be too immediate, I hope you can take it into consideration. See you around. --Skire (talk) 18:51, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to get your input on Forum:Vote:_Permaban_Reviews, if you could. I've extended the vote for a day, as I feel it's a very important decision that will effect how we deal with bans. Please add your views if you could. The Gunny 17:26, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I understand. I couldn't find any correlation and was in the process of undoing before I noticed it was done already =) Nevertheless I don't want the site to lose another editor, if it can be helped. --Skire (talk) 21:26, November 9, 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to join the 2012 Nukapedian of the Year selection board Edit
Hello!
This is a message indicating that you are one of seven or nine users selected to be part of the 2012 Nukapedian of the Year selection board. As the board, we will be determining the final winner, as well as serving in other key roles during the entire selection process. It is planned that we will meet on occasion in the Chinese FO Wiki chat to discuss matters. Please ensure that, if you are accepting this invitation, you will be available for these meetings, as functioning with an even number of members may result in an impasse.
Please reply on my talk page to respond to this invitation. You may also post suggestions regarding the organisational process or the entire programme there as well. By accepting this invitation, you will have made yourself an official member of the board, and are thus obliged to attend its meetings and make objective decisions throughout this month. By declining this invitation, you will not be a member of the board and thus free from any of its obligations. Another user will then be invited in your stead.
I understand that there may be conflicts, and so if you think you will be unable to attend to all this, then feel free to pass it up. I don't want it to be burdening, especially amidst your current duties in real life. Let me know. --Skire (talk) 01:14, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
Hi again! I know there are uncertainties about whether or not you want to/can be a member of out board, but if possible I'd like a reply on my TP by Wednesday. This is just so I can organise things with some time left. There's a whole back-up list so don't worry at all if you're too busy or your schedule is too tight for this. See you around =) --Skire (talk) 23:58, December 10, 2012 (UTC)
No problem at all, good luck on your finals! --Skire (talk) 20:26, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
I checked the Vault 13 canteen ID in the GECK loading the Classic Pack and the canteen uses the 00 from the basegame, not a DLC code. So that was a good change. You can check it typing player.additem 1735d2 1. Same thing for mercenary grenade rifle. Jspoel 00:47, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
Maybe we could check the GECK for a trigger? --Skire (talk) 04:26, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
I am terribly sorry about that. I honestly thought he removed the "it" from the sentence instead of adding it in. Again, my apologies. --Skire (talk) 18:58, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
You saw that one too, huh? Looks like you beat me to the punch on this one, only just though ;P Jasper: The Wonder that is Shroomman! 14:22, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
This issue has been disproportionally magnified to a degree that is nothing short of absurdity. The appearances sections have been changed back and forth with no improvement for quite awhile, and J and I have agreed on a standard - "appears only", to change them once and for all. These changes are to be made by the bot (currently User:TheodoricoBot) purely for the sake of consistency. You're absolutely right that both work just as well, so we've simply selected one over the other arbitrarily. It's time to put this matter to rest. --Skire (talk) 00:09, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
Like I said, the issue is really not that significant. I had originally preferred "only appears" too but really it's completely arbitrary as both are totally acceptable. They've already been changed and I believe it's best if we stop prolonging the problem. Anyone was welcome to have a say - they either didn't care or didn't want to say anything. We left a lot of time before I requested some bot work to be done, in case anyone else wanted to speak up. But before I continue, what are your thoughts on it? --Skire (talk) 00:41, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
I'm not super clear on the syntax aspect, or which one is really "American", but I've been thinking about those creatures appearances. The layout policy requires them but like you said we have different pages for each game. On the FO3 deathclaw page, for example, saying "The deathclaw appears only in Fallout 3" is quite frankly false, considering it appears pretty much every other game as well. I agree that it is redundant and even misleading, so maybe we could talk about removing them for creatures articles only? For characters and locations they may be helpful, especially in the case of certain articles, such as Harold. --Skire (talk) 00:53, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
Apart from those two words, perhaps appearances sections in general could use a forum discussion? --Skire (talk) 01:42, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice..I am still doing something wrong as the items dont fall on separate lines.--1000HrsFallout3 (talk) 22:41, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your help..it`s appreciated--1000HrsFallout3 (talk) 11:16, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
Howdy. I made a blog covering some patroller/rollback stuff. Mostly things everybody knows already, but a few things there I wanted to make sure we were all on the same page about. Take a look at User_blog:The_Gunny/Admin_talk_-_Patrolling_and_rollback and let me know in the comments that you've had a chance to check it out. Thanks, The Gunny 02:11, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
You might be right, though I am not fond of that template. It seems just to be working after 5 or more things have been stated. If you have more quotes, you can reinstate the template back. EnergyX 20:11, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Hey Mara. Hope you didn't mind me jumping into your small "interaction" between you and Ddsd567. I noticed he posted to the article talkpage about his edits. I'm sure he would appreciate your input there. Yours Always; --The Old World Relics(talk/blog/contributions) 23:25, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
So you have the FO3 guide, eh? Excellent, now I know who to ask when I have questions regarding it. Richie9999 (talk) 09:38, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
Also, according to the Pek article, that stuff on him comes from the Game of the Year guide. I dunno if that makes any difference, or if that's what you have. Richie9999 (talk) 09:41, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Mara. This is a message that I will be circulating through Nukapedia's Sysops. A while back I had created a more suitable version of the Administrators' Discussion Board as an attempt to help regulate important matters that require immediate attention from the veteran users around Nukapedia. With Fallout 4 on the horizon, I would like to begin making this feature more widely embraced, so that we all are more comfortable and familiar with using it for when the time comes around that we'll need to look towards it the most. What I would like to see is for an example to be set for where certain matters should be discussed within our community, as well as creating an environment where users will know that their issues will be addressed in a timely and fair manner. What does this mean, exactly?
Appropriate topics should be addressed within the ADB instead of the normal fora space. Not only is the ADB a general area to condense important topics, but it is also always kept at the top for easy access. (As well as having a place within the Community Messages.)
All Administrators, Moderators, Patrollers, and Bureaucrats should make it a priority to check through the ADB at least once every few days or so. This is the duty of mantling the extra tools, after all, and is not too much to ask for.
The ADB should make an appearance within new user's welcome message.
If a topic within the fora has been made that is of significant importance and affects the wiki as a whole, these topics should be moved into the ADB.
It is my hope that these requirements will help our community become more familiar with where they should go to have their grievances and ideas properly heard. Right now, the ADB has been largely ignored because the Sysops have also largely ignored it, and this is unacceptable at times when important matters such as this one are mostly by-passed except for a couple of people. With the chaos that is soon to come with the new title(s), all I am asking is for a bit of responsibility in making sure that we all recognize issues and ideas as they come up, and making sure that we do our parts in seeing them through. Thank you for reading, and I would greatly appreciate some feed-back. Once a general consensus has been reached, possible changes will be taken care of.
We were actually just discussing that in chat, join us if you'd like. I know it's supposed to respawn but that Laclongquan fellow added a bug saying it doesn't. I've never experienced said but and he's the only one to verify it (check the history on the page if you like), and it was suggested to me by Relics that I drop Theo a line to check. Richie9999 (talk) 03:44, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
Not sure, again the only person to mention it was Laclongquan, I have no idea as to the extent or anything else. Richie9999 (talk) 03:49, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
Concerning your revision of the HELIOS ONE pageEdit
Why did you remove the Protectron bug?Foxi Hooves (talk) 01:52, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
Why the fuck did you delete my shit?- Motor-Runner
This will be a circulating message to all users that expressed their opinions over my recent discussion and vote. Please make sure to update your votes accordingly to this new information:
Info-box Mk.II - For those of you wanting to see an example first, an example for how the changes will look (Keep in mind that this example is in its most basic form.) can now be found here. If a positive community consensus is reached, the new design will become functional here and the community can decide from there whether the final design is appropriate or not on Nukapedia.
JunkRadio - I would like to share a quote from the JunkRadio designer himself: "Quotation|I was thinking of adding it to the top left or bottom left corner of the wiki. I can give it absolute positioning, which means that it will display on the top left, regardless of screen resolutions. If necessary, I can make it scroll down with the page as well, although this might distract users from reading the actual pages.|Mark van Alphen"
Thank you for reading, and I'll be looking forward to gathering everyone's final opinion over these new changes. Due to the overwhelming support so far for all three changes, only needing minor points to update them for clarity, the vote will continue as normal, and will end on the 23rd as scheduled. If you would like to dispute this, please leave your concerns and reasons behind them over my talk-page. Happy editing! Some Assembly Required! 17:02, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
Oh, excuse me then for my unrightful undoings. However, I do wish to note that some of these links were not valid. A notice saying that that certain page had not been saved on the Wayback Machine was displayed, for example here. That would actually render the current link(s) useless. ~ Scribe Auroratalk 16:55, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't go out of my way to clean them up. But if you happen to be on one, and see off-topic comments, ie stuff not related to article improvement, then yeah, feel free to delete the spam. The Gunny 17:45, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
Hello Mara. This is a message I will be rotating among Nukapedia's sysops and regular contributors. I would like your input on this forum. In an attempt to remove redundancy and confusion, I have proposed some tweaks to user rights, including the elimination of the moderator position. Thanks for your time, and let me know if you have any questions. nihil novi sub sole 09:34, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
Gunny has called a straw poll to determine whether we move forward with some user rights changes. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time. nihil novi sub sole 20:23, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I guess I put the info into the article rather poorly, but I disagree with your decision to remove the info altogether. Please read Talk:Tourist_Trap#snowglobe for my reasoning. I'm following that page, so I'd prefer if you respond there rather than on my talk page or yours. Obviously thats your preference though. = SamousInd. (talk) 21:23, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure about using singular "they" around here. Wikipedia MoS has no consensus on it. I suppose it shouldn't be a problem around here and was never really discussed... "He/she", "him/her" seems preferable to me personally. --Skire (talk) 01:02, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
Not a problem. I see both used around here and for the sake of consistency and neatness I'll start using "they"/"them" more. As for the GECK, we send a message to User:Jspoelstra or ask for a screenshot from the party in question. I wish my computer was able to run FO3/FNV >_> --Skire (talk) 01:38, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that edit from earlier, I thought that mentioning dead moneys enaccessability compared to the other Dlcs was a worthy notice. (KyleD20 (talk) 18:09, April 26, 2013 (UTC))
They've made some changes to the wikia bot that adds those recently, but it looks like it has not added any welcome messages at all since the 18th. I'm looking into it right now. The Gunny 20:00, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, some recent changes wikia made had the bot log the welcome template edits on the admin who the attached to the message's edit contributions. At first they did not have a bot flag and showed up in RC. They've now readded the bot flag, but I can find no evidence of the bot adding any templates since abou the 18th, either attributed to the bot account, or to any admin. You can check this easily by clicking the "show bots" link on rc and looking for the "b" bot flag on edits. The Gunny 22:18, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
Why did you get rid of my post im playing fallout 1 right now and found it.
P.s im new to wikis.
I was wondering why you deleted my post on fallout cultural references. My fact was legit.
P.S im new to wikis
--GhostOfBigBoss (talk) 23:24, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
About your recent edit to the southwest commonwealth page, moving the Sierra Madre to California because that's where the mountains are. Where is it actually stated that the Sierra Madre Casino is in the Sierra Madre mountains? I don't remember that ever coming up. 00:50, May 5, 2013 (UTC)
Who says the Sierra Madre has to be based off of any of those locations? Maybe they chose that name simply because of the book it's based off of. If anything, I always thought the Sierra Madre was to the east, because of the abandoned bunker, but that was just my guess. Paladin117>>iff bored; 01:35, May 5, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah we've been having issues with the welcome template for awhile now. It's on Wikia's end not our though. ---bleep196- (talk) 01:38, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
Going by your version the Gremlins Stripe is only refered to as lead antagonist. My version is different from that. Why compare Stripe to a general gremlin or Mohawk instead of the named character of the movie? I strongly prefer the link in names. Jspoel 17:30, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
I did read those guides. You had just missed me in the talk. I am EXTREMELY sorry about that. I keep comparing edits, but on each one, the same error has occurred. I would hate to have a bad rep here, I love Fallout and this wiki. --Mr. Black Ops, out. (talk) 05:38, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
I think it'd be ok to add the real world reference for this. We've got the reference for the standard Grenade Rifle, courtesy of J.E. Sawyer, and it being based on the M79. Dunno where the fella is getting Russian from, though. Richie9999 (talk) 05:42, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
You dont have the decency to leave a reason? As bad as the other guy was, at least he left a oneliner so I can put my reason to counter it. You?Laclongquan (talk) 07:23, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
[quote]I would have thought the Talkpage template I added to the top of the page said enough. That small encampment and the group opposite the road have nothing to do with Dead Wind Cavern and in now way relates to improving the DWC page[/quote] I beg to differ. From the edit, I said plainly that the location has something to do with DWC, and it's revelant to that. At least it's the nearest fast travel entry point to it, the distance between it and the FTP is the same between FTP to the cavern's mouth. And where do you guys decide Talk page is not a place of discussion anyway? I'd like to jump in, cause this is something stuck in my craw.Laclongquan (talk) 08:22, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
I'm not the best with weapons. Better ask Gunny I think. Did some browsing but I can't find it in the template, too complex for me. And I noticed there was a 0.1 multiplier for additional damage in the infobox for The Professional, while the perk says it adds 20%. Looks to me like it should be 0.2 instead of 0.1 then. Jspoel 22:35, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
Twice now, you have incorrectly reverted an edit on Caesar's page, in the "behind the scenes section." Yes, C. Julius Caesar claimed Venus as an ancestor through the line of Iulius. Iulius' line would continue to the mother of Romulus and Remus, with their father being Mars. As such, the Caesar's could claim Mars as their ancestor, as well as Venus. The line on Caesar's page currently reads: Although Caesar claims to be the son of Mars, Julius Caesar claimed to be a descendant of the goddess Venus. This implies that the two both claim to be descendant from a diety, but not the same one, despite the fact the historical Caesars did in fact claim Mars as their own blood. For further reference, look at the propaganda of Augustus - his triple god ancestry (Venus, Mars, and the then-deified C. Julius Caesar) forms the foundation for many of his imperial works of art and architecture.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.210.241 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
I'll take a look at it as soon as I can. Kinda busy irl right now. I'll see what I can do, no promises, thought. Porter made that infobox template so complex that it's pretty hard to change. The Gunny 01:55, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
The template master has fixed the problem =) Removed an x from the infobox location template and everything was fine again. Ultra complex :/ You can see it on {{Infobox location}}. Not all problem are solved yet but we're making good progress. Jspoel 13:54, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
I've looked at the infobox template, and I should be able to add a perk multiplier to crit damage. It'll take me a bit, as I'll have to add quite a few variables. I'll work on it in my sandbox as time permits and see what I can do. Are there any other global perks that effect crit dam? How many do I need to allow for? The Gunny 17:30, May 25, 2013 (UTC)