So during the recent lawsuits that has gone over Bethesda and Interplay, I have been thinking "Why is Bethesda being how they are towards Interplay now? Why are they saying there breaking canon, when Seattle(possible location) has yet to be explored by the Fallout universe? Nothing is going on in Seattle as far as we know." So I think Bethesda is saying this because they are in pre-production of Fallout 4, or the next Fallout game, and it to is taking place in Seattle. But if this is the case, why do they both want Seattle(no offense to Seattle, been there, LOVE IT) why not one do one city, (Dallas, most wanted New York, etc.) Or make, please don't hate me, a Fallout prequel telling us about stuff that happened during or before the events of The Great War.
OK, getting off-topic here. But I think, all in all, Bethesda wants Fallout Online shut-down and scraped is because THEY want Seattle. "THEY" being Bethesda of course. So I don't blame them for doing what there doing... if I'm right. I don't know, this could be a BIG win, or a EPIC FAIL. But I think Fallout 4 might take place in Seattle, if Bethesda wins, or Fallout 4 might be in a whole new city if Interplay wins.
But WOW! Imagine Seattle in Post-Apocalypse America. The Space Needle. What about those smaller city around Seattle? Microsoft and Bungie references anyone? Will we see new Knights in Power Armor? Did the Enclave also evacuated to Seattle after the Oil Rig was destroyed? I think Seattle would be perfect for a face-with-the-same-feel for Fallout. I might make a new blog thingy about this stuff... so exited =D