Changes: Forum:Tranquility Lane location page

Revision as of 08:24, 26 August 2012

Forums: Index > Wiki proposals and applications > Tranquility Lane location page

Tranquility Lane page is only for the quest. It should be considered an F3 location and a new page made for it as well. Or considered part of Vault 112 and put in Vault 112 layout section. Eddo36 (talk) 00:02, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

That's been on my mind too. It's significant enough for an own location page with plenty of houses and a playground. The quest could be renamed to Tranquility Lane (quest) and the location would become Tranquility Lane, with layout according to guideline. Jspoel

01:01, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

I think something like the Anchorage Reclamation simulation would be best. Eddo36 (talk) 01:06, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

I don't agree. It's stretching way too much and is hard to read. Just stick to an old fashioned layout similar to Andale. Jspoel

01:29, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Then the Operation Anchorage sim locations would need to be added as well. As of now I think they are only detailed in that said ARS page. Eddo36 (talk) 01:35, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

In the ARS article, there is not enough information to justify a location article for each of tose locations on the map in my opinion. Also TL does not have a world map location (no pip-boy) so it would not make it a location by default. I do not see the need for a location article as the area is covered in the quest article already. It would be redundant and unnecessary.--Kingclyde (talk) 08:24, August 26, 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ::: I don't agree. It's stretching way too much and is hard to read. Just stick to an old fashioned layout similar to [[Andale]]. [[user:Jspoelstra|Jspoel]]  [[file:Speech Jspoel.png|10px|link=User talk:Jspoelstra]] 01:29, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 :::: Then the Operation Anchorage sim locations would need to be added as well. As of now I think they are only detailed in that said ARS page. [[User:Eddo36|Eddo36]] ([[User talk:Eddo36|talk]]) 01:35, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
-In the ARS article, there is not enough information to justify a location article for each of tose locations on the map in my opinion. Also TL does not have a world map location (no pip-boy) so it would not make it a location by default. I do not see the need for a location article as the area is covered in the quest article already. It would be redundant and unnecessary.
+In the ARS article, there is not enough information to justify a location article for each of tose locations on the map in my opinion. Also TL does not have a world map location (no pip-boy) so it would not make it a location by default. I do not see the need for a location article as the area is covered in the quest article already. It would be redundant and unnecessary.--[[User:Kingclyde|Kingclyde]] ([[User talk:Kingclyde|talk]]) 08:24, August 26, 2012 (UTC)