Fallout Wiki
Fallout Wiki
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
 
==Poll==
 
==Poll==
 
{{Poll|run for 7|start=17:19, July 7, 2012 (UTC)}}
 
{{Poll|run for 7|start=17:19, July 7, 2012 (UTC)}}
  +
*{{no}} - Unnecessary rule, and makes redundant work for admins. Sorry, but I see no pros to this. -- <font face="Courier New">'''GOTW''' <sup>'''[[User:GuardianOfTheWastes|User]] | [[User talk:GuardianOfTheWastes|Talk]]'''</sup></font> 17:49, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
 
*{{no}} Per GOTW. --[[User:Cheese Lord|Cheese Lord]] ([[User talk:Cheese Lord|talk]]) 18:03, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
+
* {{no}} - Unnecessary rule, and makes redundant work for admins. Sorry, but I see no pros to this. -- <font face="Courier New">'''GOTW''' <sup>'''[[User:GuardianOfTheWastes|User]] | [[User talk:GuardianOfTheWastes|Talk]]'''</sup></font> 17:49, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
*{{no}} See Below. [[User:Agent c|Agent c]] ([[User talk:Agent c|talk]]) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
+
* {{no}} Per GOTW. --[[User:Cheese Lord|Cheese Lord]] ([[User talk:Cheese Lord|talk]]) 18:03, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
  +
* {{no}} See Below. [[User:Agent c|Agent c]] ([[User talk:Agent c|talk]]) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
  +
* {{No}} I don't see any benefit to this. User rights requests and previous proposals are locked as a common practice after the poll or discussion is over anyway. And the rest has been said by Agent c already. {{User:SigmaDelta54/Sig}} 18:08, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
  +
 
==Comments==
 
==Comments==
 
As a blanket rule, I think this is a bad idea. Some blogs, like my DLC/Mod ideas are timeless, and I welcome feedback no matter when you came across them... Some users got to experience them for the first time in chat the other night. With News blogs - particularly with the Beth v Iplay series, I can see a case for a final comment from the poster encouraging people to look at the next in the series and then lock as being a good thing, rather than leaving someone who stumbles across something half way through with the wrong impression. I'm happy to start doing locks as "best practice" for news digest blogs when the next is published if others agree this is a good practice. [[User:Agent c|Agent c]] ([[User talk:Agent c|talk]]) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
 
As a blanket rule, I think this is a bad idea. Some blogs, like my DLC/Mod ideas are timeless, and I welcome feedback no matter when you came across them... Some users got to experience them for the first time in chat the other night. With News blogs - particularly with the Beth v Iplay series, I can see a case for a final comment from the poster encouraging people to look at the next in the series and then lock as being a good thing, rather than leaving someone who stumbles across something half way through with the wrong impression. I'm happy to start doing locks as "best practice" for news digest blogs when the next is published if others agree this is a good practice. [[User:Agent c|Agent c]] ([[User talk:Agent c|talk]]) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:08, 7 July 2012

Forums: Index > Wiki proposals and applications > Old blogs and forums


I constantly see people commenting on blogs that are very old. Because of this, I'm making this forum to suggest a new rule.

The reason is that people comment on blogs and edit forums that are from 2011 and earlier. In addition, people wouldn't expect someone to comment/edit something so old. A perfect example can be found here.

The rule is simple: if someone edits a forum or comments a blog that is 6 months old or more, the administrator locks it.

However, if it includes a link included in Wanted Pages/Files/Categories lists (or anything else needing maintenance) then the user is free to edit it.

So, what do you say?

Poll

  • No - Unnecessary rule, and makes redundant work for admins. Sorry, but I see no pros to this. -- GOTW User | Talk 17:49, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • No Per GOTW. --Cheese Lord (talk) 18:03, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • No See Below. Agent c (talk) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • No I don't see any benefit to this. User rights requests and previous proposals are locked as a common practice after the poll or discussion is over anyway. And the rest has been said by Agent c already. --Skire (talk) 18:08, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

As a blanket rule, I think this is a bad idea. Some blogs, like my DLC/Mod ideas are timeless, and I welcome feedback no matter when you came across them... Some users got to experience them for the first time in chat the other night. With News blogs - particularly with the Beth v Iplay series, I can see a case for a final comment from the poster encouraging people to look at the next in the series and then lock as being a good thing, rather than leaving someone who stumbles across something half way through with the wrong impression. I'm happy to start doing locks as "best practice" for news digest blogs when the next is published if others agree this is a good practice. Agent c (talk) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)