Fallout Wiki
Fallout Wiki
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Wiki discussion}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Hey everyone, this topic has been brought...")
Tag: sourceedit
 
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
Line 12: Line 12:
   
 
P.S. Shouldn't the Boulder City Memorial at least get its own page?
 
P.S. Shouldn't the Boulder City Memorial at least get its own page?
  +
  +
:{{Yes}} Just copy and paste this line on the "I support these changes" section when this comes to vote, I'll put my sig on it.
  +
  +
:P.S. And I know right?- we have all these redundant as hell pages for each person on the Boulder City Memorial yet the memorial itself exists only as a subheader. I'd find it funny if I believed it was done with a sense of humor. --[[User:The Ever Ruler|The Ever Ruler]] ([[User talk:The Ever Ruler|talk]]) 00:45, August 2, 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:45, 2 August 2015

Forums: Index > Wiki discussion > Memorial characters


Hey everyone, this topic has been brought up a lot over the years informally on chat and other places, but I wished to finally create a formal discussion here. As most of you would know, Fallout: New Vegas has two memorials which list the names of deceased soldiers: the Yangtze Memorial and the Boulder City Memorial on the Boulder City page. For some reason, hundreds of pages were created for the characters listed on these memorials, such as Michael Kilpatrick and Sandra Abbot. As you can see from these examples, each of these articles are not only a grand total of three sentences each, but the only variation in these articles is the name of the deceased soldier. These pages add virtually nothing to the wiki, just restate what the memorial page itself already states, and is in clear violation of our content organization guideline, which states:

Every article should be "strong" enough to stand on its own. This means the subject provides enough content to write an article of decent length about it.

These articles are neither of decent length nor stand on their own since they're just copies of each other and their main memorial page. To go further, there is also a downside to these articles. When people see these lists and see links to the characters, they click and spend the time and effort expecting new information. Making these people clicking these links in order to find out there's literally nothing there, is both illogical and inconvenient (Reader convenience also being part of the content organization guideline). It doesn't exactly boost user confidence in our wiki to waste their time.

Thank you all, Paladin117>>iff bored; 00:37, August 2, 2015 (UTC)

P.S. Shouldn't the Boulder City Memorial at least get its own page?

Yes Just copy and paste this line on the "I support these changes" section when this comes to vote, I'll put my sig on it.
P.S. And I know right?- we have all these redundant as hell pages for each person on the Boulder City Memorial yet the memorial itself exists only as a subheader. I'd find it funny if I believed it was done with a sense of humor. --The Ever Ruler (talk) 00:45, August 2, 2015 (UTC)