 |
This forum page has been archived. Please do not make any further edits unless they are for maintenance purposes. |
|---|
Forums: Index > Wiki discussion > Lionheart
Despite the dubious reasons for it being on this wiki in the first place, it should at least have its own canon-related category. It's a bit silly to see the "not considered canon" tag, when the game itself isn't even part the Fallout universe. There should be another text parameter added to Template:Sourcebox, for pages on games unrelated to the Fallout universe (even if they have the same stat system). 
Digital Utopia (talk) 11:49, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
- I am happy see our content on Lionheart, and if anything is locatable, TORN, expanded. Agent c (talk) 13:26, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
- That's fine; but I'm not talking about whether or not it should stay. What I am saying, is that this part: LH should have different wording. Something like "Lionheart is based on the SPECIAL system and not considered part of the Fallout universe".
Digital Utopia (talk) 20:16, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
- We have our cut content tag which states something is not verifiable by canon sources. We try to keep everything here canon. That has been a big goal here. That's why you really see no fandom stuff or mods here.--Kingclyde (talk) 07:41, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Tend to agree with Digital Utopia, a tag like "Lionheart is not considered part of the Fallout universe, the content in this page is therefore not considered Fallout canon." would be more apropriate. - Greets Peace'n Hugs (talk) (blog) 09:29, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
- That's fine; but I'm not talking about whether or not it should stay. What I am saying, is that this part: LH should have different wording. Something like "Lionheart is based on the SPECIAL system and not considered part of the Fallout universe".
I see what you mean. I remember fiddling with that template before. I'll look at it when I get home. Agent c (talk) 19:13, October 1, 2014 (UTC)