Fallout Wiki
Fallout Wiki
Line 47: Line 47:
 
# {{yes}} Yeah. --[[User:DrippyGump|DrippyGump]] ([[User talk:DrippyGump|talk]]) 23:34, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 
# {{yes}} Yeah. --[[User:DrippyGump|DrippyGump]] ([[User talk:DrippyGump|talk]]) 23:34, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 
# {{yes}} Richie has done right by nearly every action on the wiki and would be perfect for an administrator position. {{User:Aleksandr The Great/Sig}} 00:06, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
 
# {{yes}} Richie has done right by nearly every action on the wiki and would be perfect for an administrator position. {{User:Aleksandr The Great/Sig}} 00:06, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
# {{yes}} Yup, everyone here has pretty much summed up what I think. --<span style="background-color:black; border:6px double white;">[[User:The Nuclear King|<span style="color:white;">'''THE NUCLEAR KING'''</span>]]</span>[[User talk:The Nuclear King|<font color= "black"> <sup>''Talk''</sup> </font>]] 00:58, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
   
 
==No==
 
==No==

Revision as of 00:58, 18 June 2014

Forums: Index > Wiki proposals and applications > Adminship Request - Richie9999


Howdy folks, how's tricks? I'm Richie9999 and I'm asking for your support in running for the privilege of Administrator of this fine wiki.

Who am I and why me?

I've been around this wiki since November of 2010, but didn't become active until the summer of 2011 when chat was first implemented. Since then I've become a frequent editor of the wiki (with the exception of the Spring of 2012-January 2013, when life caught up with me, and part of this past spring when I was finishing up my college studies). Many of you might know me as a member of the chat community where I always keep an eye on Recent Changes while in chat. While I've been on this wiki I have received the support of the community in requesting chat moderator rights, and now I am asking for your support once more.

So why vote for me you may be wondering? Well for one thing, it'll speed up the process of banning vandals that I, and others, encounter when watching recent changes, due to the fact that there won't be the need to hunt down an admin on the wiki or in chat to ban the vandals. The way I see it, banning of vandals should happen sooner rather than later, as they may strike again. Additionally, by having another admin we can hopefully avoid pages needing deletion standing for extended periods of time, as well as chat banned users coming back over and over again abusing thinly veiled sock puppets to evade chat bans until they are wiki banned.

Edit Count

There should have been a list of this user's edit counts here, but the edit counts feature is no longer available.

Other Contributions

I've created the following pages (Drunk and the Jefferson Memorial terminal entries being made since my return):

I have also:

  • Gone through the Van Buren character pages checking for images for the characters' pages in the design documents while removing the image needed tag where no image existed and adding them when needed, during which I found two articles for the same character, two characters with images in the design documents but not on their page (which was soon added) as well as a page for a character that didn't actually exist in the design documents.
  • Revamped the FNV character page.
  • Aided Gunny in his infobox value project.
  • Working with Gunny on updating Formspring links to webarchive versions.

Poll

Yes

  1. Yes represent Dead Gunner's SMG JPG1 "Semper Invictus" 18:23, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Yes Gunslinger470/The-Gunslinger "Some say this user is a Moderator..." Some say this user used to be a Moderator... 18:34, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Yes This has been a long time coming. ---bleep196- (talk) 18:35, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Yes Absolutely a million times. Character, dedication, responsibility, Richie has it all. Navy athletics Don't give up the ship! Bill the goat 19:12, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Yes I would have probably voted no, because we had enough admins. However, considering Gunny has left, you can fill his role as an admin. Energy X 19:23, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Yes Don't disappoint me, nemesis. JASPER//"Do you like hurting other people?"UserRichard 19:26, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Yes Understanding, but has a firm resolve. Like a good parent, Richie is adamant about the rules, but will explain why they exist and is open to negotiation; we need this friendly sort of admin. Plus Gunny left unannounced and you can never have enough admins. --Kastera (talk) 19:31, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  8. Yes Richie has shown to be responsible and mature, he actively fulfills his duties as a moderator and often has need for an admin. That coupled with his character leads me to believe that Richie is capable to hold and utilize administrative rights. --MountHail (talk) 19:38, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Yes He has shown nothing but competence and maturity during his time as patroller and chat-mod. No reason to say no, and many to say yes.
    Limmiegirl Lildeneb Talk! ♪
  10. Yes Basically, everything the others said. Paladin117>>iff bored; 21:35, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Yes Greets Peace'n Hugs (talk) (blog)
  12. Yes --WrightEveryTime 22:20, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  13. Yes A fine addition to the admin team. User Talk:ArchmageNeko Archmage NekoNeko's Haunt 22:36, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  14. Yes It was only a matter of time, yes yes. --TwoBearsHigh-Fiving (Talk) 22:44, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  15. Yes Richie is a honest man, communicative, and has good ideas. As a chat mod he's outstanding, and i'm sure he will do an outstanding job as an admin. I fully support him. Mbc0102 (talk) 23:17, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  16. Yes Richie showcases many characteristics that one should search for in a potential administrator. His continued dedication is only matched by his knowledge, character, editing prowess and all around excellent demeanor. It is with my utmost trust and faith in Richie that I whole heartily support his request for administrative rights. I know Richie stands to be an excellent edition to our administrative team and I look forward to his continued excellent work for all of us here at Nukapedia. --The Old World Relics (talk/blog/contributions) 23:31, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  17. Yes Yeah. --DrippyGump (talk) 23:34, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
  18. Yes Richie has done right by nearly every action on the wiki and would be perfect for an administrator position. Boltman BOLTMAN FOREVER 00:06, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
  19. Yes Yup, everyone here has pretty much summed up what I think. --THE NUCLEAR KING Talk 00:58, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

No

Neutral

Comments